
René Magritte, Mysteries of the Horizon, credit Wikipedia
I’m So Good at My Job
Bill Hartley looks at Linkedin
Linkedin is described by some sources as social media but others see it differently. Whatever the definition, the idea is that users can post their profile and someone looking for people with their skills may get in touch. Further, those working in the same field can use the site to connect; possibly a more effective method than a chance encounter at a conference. In short, this electronic version of networking is intended to provide job opportunities or sources of help and advice. How well it works in practice is hard to say, though the membership statistics are impressive. The marketplace is huge and worldwide. It’s said that Human Resources departments routinely use the site both to seek candidates for a vacancy and to cross check job applications against a profile, before short listing for interviews. Clearly, for some, it is a powerful tool.
On the other hand it is also well used by people in the Civil Service. There might be a case for those working in specialist areas of the public sector, such as tax, for showcasing themselves on Linkedin. Otherwise and more appropriately, there are internal lines of communication throughout government departments. Why then is Linkedin of such interest? After all, once they attain a certain level of seniority, Civil Servants seldom enter the jobs market. They have pensions to protect and there are obscure rules which can adversely affect those who leave and re-enter the public sector. Unsurprisingly cultural differences exist between those who hazard themselves in the private sector jobs market and people in a form of employment where redundancy is rarely an issue. In the internal Civil Service jobs market they don’t routinely resort to Linkedin. HR ‘professionals’ in the public sector are the least adventurous of civil servants and seldom make decisions if they can kick the problem upstairs and have senior management solve it for them. Internal appointments follow a strict formula, even if questions are often asked about the honesty of the outcomes.




















