Government is the Cause of “Brexit-Trump Syndrome”


 Government is the Cause of “Brexit-Trump Syndrome”

Stephen Michael MacLean delivers some home truths

The Powers that be never fail to demonstrate why they have earned the enmity of the average citizen. Bound up in a cocoon of self-satisfaction and self-denial, their political coup de grâce cannot come soon enough. This self-important élite are flummoxed by the people’s revolt in Britain and America, known respectively as Brexit and the Trump movement. A recent column dispatched from the prestigious London School of Economics and Political Science amply displays their continuing bewilderment.

Coining the term ‘Brexit-Trump Syndrome’, British academics Michael Jacobs and Mariana Mazzucato claim that an inability to understand economic reality explains why average working-class citizens, who suffered lost jobs and wages and failed to bounce back from the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-09 (despite billions spent in stimulus schemes), voted either to exit the European Union or put Donald Trump in the White House. Both described as ‘disastrous’ socio-economic choices. The implications drawn are that people were duped into voting against their financial interests. Au contraire. GDP growth is first examined. American ‘median household incomes are basically the same today as they were a quarter of a century ago’, the authors note, ‘even though GDP has grown by almost 80 per cent over this period.’ Similar statistics can be adduced for Britain, though this divergence is more recent. The problem, however, lies in the manner of calculating GDP, which includes both private and public spending.  Not only does this entail double counting, since government revenue is raised through taxing private financial gain, but government does not provide any good or service of added value to the taxpayer.

As the classical economist John Stuart Mill observed, nothing is more patently false than the political nostrum ‘that the more you take from the pockets of the people to spend on your own pleasures, the richer they grow . . .’ GDP exceeds median incomes because stats are swollen by coercive contributions to government redistribution and, adding insult to injury, to compensate the labours of ‘beneficent’ state redistributors.

The dispersal of corporate profit is the next culprit. Our scholars take issue with shareholder dividends and management salaries ‘in record amounts to boost share prices’ at the expense of maximizing profits to ‘reinvest in future productive capacity.’ Add to this the $2 trillion ‘sitting on the books of public companies in the US, rather than being reinvested . . .’

In the United States, government policy accounts for much of this distortion. When corporate taxes can be 35 per cent and applicable taxes of capital gains and dividends strike stock-owners rise to 15 per cent apiece — combined to a maximum tax of 30 per cent — it makes short-term economic sense for corporations to pay the lesser of the two and pay out to individuals rather than be penalised for growing the business. Government’s insatiable appetite for tax revenue makes it impossible for corporations to plan for the long-term and wary of capital-intensive investment. The American public — employers and employees, including state welfare recipients — are hurt by this artificial restraint on economic growth and prosperity.

Corporate tax cuts will repatriate overseas profits, reverse tax inversion, and encourage investment; meanwhile, a sensible tax code (such as a consumption or flat tax) will end the injustice of double taxation, where wholly ‘consumed’ income can be spent guilt-free but financial gains from ‘invested’ income that serves a public good get repeat visits from the tax-collector.

Ironically, Jacobs and Mazzucato’s third indictment of Brexit-Trump is reserved for government itself —that it does too little, rather than too much. Not only has capitalism failed the people, they say, but the commonwealth too, the people’s last, best champion.  ‘This private failure to invest is matched by a failure of public investment,’ the authors lament. Critics of government failure have focused on austerity to the detriment of marshalling stimulus in the service of sustained growth when, Jacobs and Mazzucato write, ‘unregulated financial markets are prone to misallocating resources and creating asset bubbles which must inevitably burst.’

So much for progressive economic insight within the academy, overrun with false prophets of the Keynesian faith. J.S. Mill had its measure a century ago. ‘The utility of a large government expenditure, for the purpose of encouraging industry, is no longer maintained,’ he wrote in 1844. ‘It is no longer supposed that you benefit the producer by taking his money, provided you give it to him again in exchange for his goods.’ Unless, that is, you live in ivory towers, where almost anything can be supposed. For it is a utopian fantasy to blame Wall Street financiers when Fed-issued fiat money, by its very ethereal existence, distorts production and causes malinvestment in scarce resources.

Don’t like Brexit-Trump Syndrome? Stagnant wages? Lack of corporate investment?  Failed stimulus? The antidote is simple. As are rising real wages, capital accumulation, and investment for economic growth and prosperity. It’s free markets, entrepreneurial innovation, and voluntary exchange. But it’s definitely not government intervention.

Stephen MacLean maintains the weblog The Organic Tory

This entry was posted in Current Affairs and Comment, QR Home and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Government is the Cause of “Brexit-Trump Syndrome”

  1. David Ashton says:

    Why haven’t the “proles” all turned to the renascent international “socialists” rather than the right-wing national “racists”?

  2. Frederick says:

    Never mind that the anti-culture created by TV, which is easily the most powerful culturally formative force operating in the world has created this situation. Even to the degree that the first post-truth USA President is/was a “reality”-TV “star. Which is also to say that the Donald is the very embodiment of everything that is wrong with USA “culture”.
    The adolescent TV-“culture” that he represents and promotes is accurately portrayed in the movie Beavis and Butthead Do America.

    Or more chillingly by combining the dark anti-human scenarios described by Aldous Huxley in Brave New World, and George Orwell in 1984. Everybody stupified by drugs of various kinds, both legal and illegal, including prescription drugs. And with the ever-expanding warfare state reducing all of humankind and culture to rubble.

    When the entire human world founds itself on the adolescent motive to aggrandize the separate individual, then everyone is collectively working toward the destruction not only of human culture and mankind itself, but even of the Earth, the very vehicle that supports life.

    The modern TV created everyman of consumer society is an unconscious propagandized individual, participating in TV and media created illusions and, effectively, self-destructing.
    At present, a culture of total war, a culture of death, is ruling, while the people are engaged in and stupified in mindless consumerism.

    • David Ashton says:

      This may seem an overstatement, but it indicates an escalating danger to humanity. We can add the destruction of the imagination, literature and considered response, the post-truth hatreds unleashed on “social” media, and cyber-warfare.

      If there is hope it may lie not with the proles (was Orwell being ironic?) but with the young people such as those known as Generation Identity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.